Dual xeon x5690 benchmark

Although the Intel Xeon L is a lot of processor with very low power consumption requirements, the Intel Xeon X is a much higher-end part. Although quad socket capable, the X is also dual socket capable and fills a position that the Xeon E series does not scale to at this time.

At a base clock of 2. The test platform was the same as the dual Intel Xeon E review. I detailed the dual Xeon processor build in an earlier dual processor test bed build log piece. To get power consumption numbers I removed all add-in cards.

dual xeon x5690 benchmark

It should be noted that this build cannot be directly compared to the UP power consumption numbers simply because I am using more fans than normal most test configurations are single-fan with a PicoPSU.

Overall, this is a fairly solid dual Xeon platform that can be used to attach 22 hard drives and that has a ton of expandability. I will start off this section by saying that the standard test suite was built to test UP platforms. I have seen repeatedly that at twelve core counts and higher that some of the tests simply do note scale with more cores.

As a result, I am adding a few new tests to the suite for the physical core reviews. These will be added as I can get them to be repeatable and consistent, but I am getting close, really close on a few.

With that being said, a lot of readers ask for WEI scores so I have learned to oblige. I have been using Cinebench benchmarks for years but have held off using them on ServeTheHome. I have had quite a few readers contact me about this type of performance for things like servers that are Adobe CS5 compute nodes and similar applications.

Cinebench R Here the dual Intel Xeon X setup proves to be fast, and amazingly so. Watching Cinebench render was quite a sight at this speed. With the upcoming Interlagos launch AMD needs to be exceeding these figures to be competitive. This specialized hardware has many practical uses and is becoming more supported.

AMD will be following suit starting with their next generation parts, but for now, the Opteron series does not have AES acceleration. The dual Xeon X configuration absolutely obliterated the TryeCrypt benchmark.

Specifically, the hardware accellerated AES test was well beyond anthing this site has tested to date. Compared to its competition, the dual Xeon X configuration provides blistering performance. I am working to make Folding Home a standardized benchmark, as it is a mature distributed computing client.

I will post more information here once I get the methodology perfected and can run this on a few configurations. I will say that I was able to garner 15 minute frame times with this configuration. I am not devoting much time to the standard Handbrake results because, as was seen in the Dual Xeon L and dual HE review, Handbrake scales really well with up to four cores, and fairly well up to eight.

Once twenty four or more threads can be handled at a time the results become inconclusive at best.

Omp decision process

For those wondering I saw fps on the standard definition tests and 42fps on the hi-def tests. That is not an amazing number but still solid. Running at full load with eight DIMMs one saw w, which is very low. On the other hand, the dual Intel Xeon X setup used considerably more power. This type of power consumption is not terrible, but certainly not the best out there. On the other hand, when looking for very high-end performance, the dual X setup does not use an egregious amount of power.

The Opteron HE and Xeon L parts are significantly slower, but are marketed and presumably binned as low power parts unlike the Intel Xeon On the other hand, the Xeon X allows one to consolidate several smaller systems into one larger system.

In a datacenter environment, spending a bit more per CPU may be worthwhile.The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 34, CPUs tested.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components.

Stephanie yap sydney

You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades. We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs.

Very good overclocking potential. Running everything quite smoothly. Back in the days this CPU cost over euros.

Kext not loaded

Good overclock speeds but lacking in IPC - It's days are numbered but it still hits hard and totally relevant paired with a modern GPU. A ti is the limit as it saturates the PCIE 2. I have two Dell T systems. One for gaming and the other to stream my games. The streaming system is running Manjaro Linux and it rocks.

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank. Save as guest. X X X X X Average Bench: Good average bench The Intel Xeon X averaged This is an excellent result which ranks the Intel Xeon X near the top of the comparison list. Strengths Avg. Memory Latency Single Core Mixed Speed Very good consistency The range of scores 95th - 5th percentile for the Intel Xeon X is just This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Xeon X performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses Avg. Multi Core Mixed Speed Pts. Average Bench Based on 2, samples. Rank GBR-User, 1 day ago. Xeon X. CAN-User, 18 hrs ago. FRA-User, 2 hrs ago.Forums New posts Search forums. New posts What's new Latest activity New profile posts. Members Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts. Search forums. Log in. Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community. JavaScript is disabled.

For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter AK47 Start date Dec 22, Status Not open for further replies. AK47 New Member. Joined Jun 15, Messages 7 0. I await your reply with impatience, because it requires that I decided I do not want to regret my uppgrade later the SR2 is still the monster again? Joined Oct 29, Messages 1, 0. Well a X at 4. But not many X get that far so for multi threaded tasks your setup is better.

However in gaming a X is always going to be faster. But unless you have 3 or 4 R9 s or better you don't need an X99 system. And what about the Z97? AK47 said:. Joined Apr 10, Messages 17, 3.

Joined Jul 19, Messages 43, 8. So, with whatever you use your computer for, does it work as intended? Use it until you find the performance is lacking. Joined Mar 4, Messages 3, 0. OK so I have a question. Would this allow you to use more lanes than 1 and get the OC benefits from the s? ZenZimZaliben said:. Xeon version of the which is the Exx V3 series. Joined Sep 17, Messages 0. It really all comes down to what you're doing with your rig. A X with one or more recent graphic cards will make you happy and cost a lot less.

However, if you are actually using the power of all those CPU cores for stuff like compression, encryption, heavy video editing or running multiple VMs, then yes, those X's absolutely rule! I moved from a dual E setup and while I wouldn't call it a "monster" this dual X setup is certainly "up to the task".Release date: Q2 I have two Dell T systems.

One for gaming and the other to stream my games. The streaming system is running Manjaro Linux and it rocks. This ten-core hyperthreaded processor can easily be overclocked so that all twenty threads run at an eye-watering 5.

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

Save as guest. X X X X X Effective Speed. Real World Speed. Benchmark your CPU here. Average Score. Memory Avg. Memory Latency Single Core Mixed Speed Overclocked Score. Memory OC Memory Latency Market Share.Menu Menu.

Intel Xeon X5690 Benchmarks

Search Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. Search Advanced…. Log in. Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4. Support UI. X Donate Contact us.

the SR2/dual x5690 is still the monster again ?

New posts Trending Search forums. What's new. New posts New profile posts Latest activity. Current visitors New profile posts Search profile posts Billboard Trophies. Thread starter theostryjohn Start date Sep 28, Sidebar Sidebar. Forums Hardware CPUs. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Previous Next Sort by votes.

dual xeon x5690 benchmark

Sep 11, 11 0 10 0. Who is win?

Calico conntrack

Sep 22, 3, 99 27, There are also much faster Xeons available. X 6 core 3. It's going to burn some electricity and need some cooling to do it. Countgreen Reputable.

Jun 24, 9 4, The 2x xeon will win if the software supports that type of configuration. You must log in or register to reply here. Replaced thermal paste several times already.

Any help is appreciated. Similar threads Question Will a k bottleneck a ?

dual xeon x5690 benchmark

Question Why is my I7 k processor overheating? Post thread. Graphics Cards. News comments.

Intel Xeon X5670 Dual Six Core Processor Benchmarks and Review

Power Supplies. Latest posts. Consumer Electronics.Sort Compare. Intel Xeon X 3. Reasons to buy the Intel Xeon X Much higher clock speed 3.

Intel Xeon X 2. Reasons to buy the X Significantly lower typical power consumption Review Differences Benchmarks Specifications Comments. Benchmark performance using all cores. PCMark 8 Home 3. Single-core Performance. Individual core benchmark performance. Integrated Graphics.

Pulcini misti b prim – lnd lazio

Integrated GPU performance for graphics. Integrated Graphics OpenCL. Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing. CompuBench 1. Performance per Watt. How efficiently does the processor use electricity? Are you paying a premium for performance?

Combination of all six facets. See full details. Differences What are the advantages of each. Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X Benchmarks Real world tests of Xeon X vs X GeekBench bit Data courtesy Primate Labs. PassMark Data courtesy Passmark. PassMark Single Core.Sort Compare. Intel Xeon X 3.

Intel Xeon X5650 vs i7 8700K

Intel Core i7 K 3. Review Differences Benchmarks Specifications Comments. Benchmark performance using all cores. PCMark 8 Home 3. Single-core Performance. Individual core benchmark performance.

dual xeon x5690 benchmark

Integrated Graphics. Integrated GPU performance for graphics. Integrated Graphics OpenCL. Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing. CompuBench 1. Performance per Watt. How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Are you paying a premium for performance? Combination of all six facets. See full details. Intel Xeon X Differences What are the advantages of each. Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X GeekBench bit Data courtesy Primate Labs. PassMark Data courtesy Passmark. PassMark Single Core. Specifications Full list of technical specs.


thoughts on “Dual xeon x5690 benchmark

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *